stadia.gr/forum

[Manchester_7]

Μην εισαι σιγουρος, γιατι οι Ολυμπιακοι ειναι καλοκαιρια και οι πυροσβεστες εχουν πολλες δουλειες τοτε

[Mozart]

[aristidis]

[billy8181]

[Avon]

[aristidis]

Δεν πειραζει Ανδρεα, για να καλμαρουμε τον πονο σου θα πεισουμε τη ΔΟΕ να βαλει την Καυλομοιρα να τραγουδησει στην Τελετη Εναρξης του 2012!!! (και αν μοιραζουν και βαμβακι στους θεατες θα ειναι υπεροχα!!!...)

[exitmusician]

[Ypsilon]

Εεεεεεεεεε !!!!
Ξέρεις τη διεύθυvση του chat Αριστείδη, έτσι δεν είναι? (Πλάκα θα’χει να απαντήσεις κιόλας «ναι την ξέρω»).

[aristidis]

Διαγράφεται

Y

[Maiden]

[Mozart]

Καράτε, δε ξέρω. Θα είναι πολλά θα "βαρέα" αθλήματα μετά. Λογικά γκόλφ θα μπει σίγουρα και ράγκμπι, μιας και βγαίνουν 2 ομαδικά, να μπει τουλάχιστον ένα καινούριο.

[villsugar]

gia tou logou to alithes na simeiosoume oti duo apo ta xtupimata itan teliws ksekarfota....

to xtupima sto edgware ... pou einai mia apo tis pio mousoulmanokratoumenes perioxes tou inner london

kai to xtupima sto lewforio pou itan to no.30 erxotan apo to Hackney...isws to poio upovathmismeno borough tou londinou...

kamia prospathia shmeiologikis anaforas... + apotelesmatikotita xtupimatwn arketa periorismeni gia ta osa mas exei sunithisei i al kainta...

oti egine egine gia na akoustei... isws i epixeirisiaki dinatotita na exei perioristei... isws kai oxi...

[Dimiskour]

Πιστευω οτι τα σπορ που θα αντικαταστησουν μπειζμπολ και σοφτμπολ θα πρεπει να ειναι οσο το δυνατο πιο δημοφιλη παγκοσμιως.

Το ραγμπυ, για μενα, πληροι τη παραπανω προυποθεση παρολο που στην Ελλαδα ειναι σχετικα αγνωστο.

Δειτε παρακατω ποιες χωρες μετειχαν στο τελευταιο παγκοσμιο πρωταθλημα, το οποιο κερδισε η Αγγλια:

Australia, Argentina, New Zealand, Italy, France, Fiji, Ireland, Romania , South Africa, Uruguay, Wales, Canada, Scotland, Japan, England, Georgia, Namibia, USA, Tonga, Samoa, Uruguay.

Οσον αφορα το θεαμα, αν και προσωπικα δε θα κατσω να παρακολουθησω εναν ολοκληρο αγωνα, εν τουτοις, γουσταρω πολυ να βλεπω τα καλυτερα στιγμιοτυπα. Διοτι οταν καταφερνει μια ομαδα να σκοραρει, η προσπαθεια που απαιτειται ειναι συνηθως συγκλονιστικη.

Τελος απο πλευρας ανταγωνιστικοτητας, οι μαχες μεταξυ Αγγλιας, Αυστραλιας, Νεας Ζηλανδιας, Νοτιας Αφρικης, Γαλλιας και τελευταια, Ουαλιας ειναι αρκετες για αναψουν τα αιματα στις εξεδρες!!

[billy8181]

[donganos]

Δεδομένου ότι τα νέα α8λήματα θα κάνουν "ποδαρικό" στο Λονδίνο, θεωρώ δεδομένο ότι θα μπεί το ράγκμπυ, και από εκεί και πέρα με σειρά τα:
Γκολφ
(και με μεγάλη διαφορά)
Σκουός
Καράτε

Το ρόλλερ σκέιτ ίσως μπει στο μέλλον, αφού όμως πρώτα μπει το πεντόβολο, η μακρά γαϊδούρα και το κρυφτό.

EDIT: billy, στα site που παραθέτεις το καράτε συγκρίνεται με τα waterski, squash, finswimming, billiard και bowling!
Έλεος δηλαδή! μόνο το φλιπεράκι και ο pacman λείπουν!

[projected]

http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~scumbag/images/2012.jpg

[billy8181]

[Ypsilon]

Για να μην διαφωνείτε άδικα πάντως, και επειδή (υπενθυμίζω) εδώ μιλάμε για Λονδίνο 2012, τελικά τα δυο αθλήματα που αφαιρέθηκαν δεν θα αντικατασταθούν με κανένα από τα υποψήφια αφού δεν πάρθηκε η απαραίτητη πλειοψηφία. Το Λονδίνο θα φιλοξενήσει μόνο 26 αθλήματα λοιπόν, με προοπτική κάποιο από αυτά που αφαιρέθηκαν να επανέλθουν σε επόμενη Ολυμπιάδα.

http://www.in.gr/news/article.asp?lngEntityID=637028&lngDtrID=246

[Maiden]

Είναι σίγουρο πως δεν θα ξαναγίνει ψηφοφορία μέχρι το 2008 για τυχόν νέα αγωνίσματα το 2012?

[billy8181]

[jortheo]

Θα κανουν οικονομια οι Αγγλοι, 2 λιγοτερα αθλητικα συγκροτηματα. Αρχισαν οι περικοπες.

[Maiden]

Μετά τις πρόσφατες βόμβες στο Λονδίνο, οι αγώνες της Αθήνας γίνονται μια πολύ γλυκιά ανάμνηση στο μυαλό των μελών της ΔΟΕ. Το παραδέχεται μέχρι και ο "πολύς" Ντίκ Πάουντ!

Διαβάστε: http://www.sportime.gr/xst/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=60&Itemid=1

Επίσης ένα πολύ κατατοπιστικό άρθρο για την διοργάνωση του Λονδίνου 2012: http://www.sportime.gr/xst/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3460&Itemid=1

[Ydrohoos]

Apo to Beeston tou Leeds oi vomvistes.......

konta sti getonia mou !!!

.........trelo !!!!

[Choriatis 2004]

Και γιατι να μη γινει το snooker Ολυμπιακο Αθλημα?(δεν κανω πλακα)
Προτεινω και το φιδακι επι Nokia

[marin]

Ταξτε μου ταξτε μου! Τι σας εχω; Αρθρακι κολαφος απο τους Times (ειναι αν μη τι αλλο consistent) για την περιοχη που εχει επιλεγει για το Ολυμπιακο παρκο στο Λονδινο...και δεν εχουν περασει καλα καλα 15 μερες απο την αναθεση.
Το παραθετω ως εχει καθως πολλοι απο εσας δεν μπορειτε να το δειτε απο το site.
Εχουμε να δουμε τετοια πολλα κατι μου λεε απο τον παντα γκρινιαρη Βρετανικο τυπο.

London 2012 Olympic Park to be built on nuclear site
By David Charter and John Goodbody



LONDON’S proposed Olympic Park in 2012 had been the site of an experimental nuclear reactor, it was revealed yesterday. London 2012 officials insisted, though, that the area was free from nuclear contamination and senior bid figures told The Times that it came as a surprise to learn that Queen Mary College’s department of nuclear engineering built a reactor at the Lower Lea Valley in 1980.

The college issued a statement declaring that the reactor was closed down in 1982, under supervision by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, and that there were “absolutely no ongoing health implications of the decommissioned reactor”.



London 2012 said that it had not disclosed the existence of the reactor to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) because it had not known about it until yesterday and its own environmental advisers had not raised “any nuclear contamination issues”. But the Conservative member of the London Assembly who made details of the reactor public called for a fresh survey of the site. Bob Blackman, the Tory economic development spokesman, said: “If there was an experimental nuclear reactor there . . . they may well have closed it down properly and removed the contamination. But have they surveyed it recently?”

Mike Lee, the bid spokesman, said that environmental advisers had assured the London Development Agency that there was “no nuclear contamination issue”. Lee flatly denied Blackman’s claims that he had confirmed there was a nuclear contamination issue with the site. “We were not aware of this issue when we submitted the candidate file to the IOC,” Lee said. “The only time that the bid became aware was when the matter was raised in the London Assembly today.”

The candidate file, which was submitted to the IOC on November 15, 2004, was examined by the IOC’s evaluation commission, which visited London in February. No mention of the fact that there had been a nuclear reactor on the site of the Olympic Park appears in its official report, which was published on June 6 and read by IOC members before they voted in Singapore on July 6.

London 2012 insiders were furious at the way Blackman raised the issue, dismissing the disclosure as “a storm in a teacup”. Lee has accused Blackman of “scaremongering”.

During the meeting, Blackman asked: “This site was also the site of a nuclear reactor at one stage. Can you assure us that all of that contamination has been removed?” Lee responded: “My understanding is that all the remediation work that is needed, the decontamination that is needed, is being planned and is under way. Everybody who has been engaged in this — and there has been a lot of assessment of the area and the land — knows that it will be fully decontaminated and safe before the building work starts.”

Asked last night to explain why he had apparently known about the issue, despite having said that the bid team became aware of it only yesterday, Lee said: “My comments were of a very general nature, dealing with contamination. They were not to do with any issue about a nuclear reactor.”

In its statement, Queen Mary College said that the now-defunct Department of Nuclear Engineering used to house a small nuclear reactor at Marshgate Lane. It added: “It was used for undergraduate experiments and postgraduate projects, and for training people to work in or on nuclear power stations.

“It was decommissioned in 1982 under supervision by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate. The reactor was exceptionally small; the core was the size of a bucket and produced virtually no energy. Decommissioning staff were able to stand inside the reactor void with no protective clothing.”

Later, a spokesman for the college said that the core was dismantled and removed but that the concrete shield was found to have some minor contamination. Those radioactive parts were chipped away and sent to a nuclear processing plant. “As far as the college is aware, none of the material from the reactor is buried on the site,” the spokesman added.

Professor Ian Fells, of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, agreed that there was no risk. “I should be very surprised if there is any substantial contamination from the reactor at all,” he said. “Those reactors were feeble in power — that was the reason they were allowed to have one on a university campus in the first place.”

A spokesman for the London Development Agency said: “This seems to be completely spurious. There is no issue here because it was fully decontaminated 23 years ago. It is not relevant what was there years ago if there are no health implications now. There was a full process of checking everything in the area.” No one from the IOC was available to comment.